I assembled the new windmill and bolted on a 1.5 watt solar panel (or so it's rated) on top for a bit more power. I wired everything up with blocking diodes (independently for the solar panel and generator.) I wired it up modular and consider it done.
While I was taking pictures …
1,827 total views, 2 views today
I have been in the habit of going for a walk in the mornings to clear my head and this was no exception. The one exceptional event was it's trash day and I was out very early. I came upon one house with what appeared to be a paper feeder for a copier (or at least most of such a beast.) I walked past it but then went back and took a closer look at the motors (which appear to be pretty beefy) and that it had a bunch of smaller springs (that I can use as tensioners.) I walked it back home and then went on with other things
Later on, I got a chance to test the motors. Actually, I just drilled a hole in a piece of dowel to use as a roller and bolted the motor in place — I had drilled holes in the the motor holder for what appeared to be two "standard" sizes. Well, this one is as big a motor as will fit and I brought it to the big attic fan and gave it a whirl. It generated about 25 volts open at that wind speed (a lot) and output 7.5 volts into 51 ohms: about 0.15 amps or 1.1 watts. I installed a larger spindle and got 8.8 volts (0.17A) into it or 1.5 watts. I found that with just a diode, I could charge the battery at 0.12 amps out. That's not bad, but it could be better. I decided that if I also throw on the solar panel I have (supposedly 1.5 watts) and hook it all up, I might be able to get to a point where the whole system is pretty close to self-sufficiency.
If the draw during the day is 0.2A and the draw at night is 0.4A, I might assume an average of 0.3 amps all day. If the generator can average 0.1 amps (very optimistic) and the solar panel 75mA for half the day (35mA average, also pretty optimistic) that's 0.135A average in, reducing my overall average load to 0.165A: the 7 amp-hour battery would then last about 42 hours! That's way better than the 23 hours I can get at 0.3 amps.
1,710 total views, 4 views today
I don't think I mentioned it (and am too lazy to scroll down to check) but a friend of mine stopped by the other day and I was showing her all the stuff I've built so far. I loaded the switching power supply with 3 ohms to demonstrate the noise I get, but later I realized the -5 volt output was no longer working … odd. Tonight (Friday, by the way, and yes, I have had a few drinks — a chilled shot of Ouzo, a Saranac Pale Ale, and a Genesee can at home) I checked the power supply and inexplicably, the LM324 died — the op-amp that controlled the pulse-width modulation stayed at the positive rail for no reason. I pulled it and threw it away, even though it might have just as well been a loose connection. Replacing it worked just dandy. I tried connecting every LED — both strings, all three colors — and the input drew 0.53 amps for 0.76 amps out (in power, that's 6.36 watts in for 3.8 watts out for an efficiency of 59.7% — cool: almost 4 watts of output through LED's!) Anyway, I decided that the switching noise wasn't going to be much of a problem. Even with all three colors on one string lit, the noise is noticeable but ignorable … it adds an element of irritation. If I go to just one color lit (which, technically, is the load under bit modulation) the noise becomes nearly inaudible except very close. I have my fingers crossed.
5,519 total views, 4 views today
I decided that in this last week or so before I leave town, I'd pick up one more task: build a Savonius generator on the Bike With 2 Brains. So on Tuesday morning I got up and started thinking about designing it. I figured out that the bicycle seat posts are the right size to fit the "#608" size skate bearings — I had bought a pack of them because the 8mm hole is just a hair bigger than the 5/16" (7.99mm) threaded rod and bolts I planned to be using.
Wednesday I got up and started designing it in CAD. By 11 I came up with building a basic cube frame with a pair of centered cross-beams from side-to-side to hold the rotor. The key part is the detail below with the arm to hold the generator with a friction-coupling to the baby-stroller wheel (which is ultimately why I went with 5/16": it's the shaft diameter of the stroller wheel.) The diagram of this detail is below:
Basically, the rectangles on the left and right are the frame mounts and the center horizontal rectangle is the support bar. The small central circle is the bearing and the large circle is the baby-stroller wheel with the centered diagonal rectangle representing the 2×4 used for the rotor. The angled dimension lines surround the generator bar — the larger circle below the baby-stroller wheel is the motor housing and the smaller is the motor spindle (a wood dowel.) The line connecting the bolt (it's supposed to be a bolt and looks better in CAD zoomed in) is linked to the center frame by a spring.
I built a rotor that afternoon. The original one I designed had two problems: first, the shaft holes weren't well centered, and second, the top and bottom plates were not exactly parallel. I paid more attention to those two problems and things came out much better. I also used whatever remained of the vent pipe I had bought — it's just like the original prototype except that it's about 14" long. I even got the bearings mounted on the end and thought, "gee, that's it?" expecting it to be harder to make.
Thursday I got up and started working on the frame. I welded together a basic frame and rethought the cube shape: instead I went with a wide bracket for the rotor bearings and put the vertical members on either side of that. By that evening I had finish-welded the frame and tack-welded the brackets to mount the generator. It was almost hard to assemble it in the very light breeze because the rotor would spin so easily.
Friday I built the rest of the motor mount, mounted the preferred motor, and tested it against the fan in the attic — essentially the blower from a furnace. I was able to get about 4.5 volts open-circuit, 2 volts into 5 ohms (0.8 watts) and 1.5 volts into 3 ohms (0.75 watts.) I had to use a weaker spring than I started with because the friction of the stoller wheel against the dowel was too much when it was pulled tight. I don't know the wind speed nor the rotation speed, but it was pretty dangerous looking. I finished up the brackets and threw on some paint in the evening.
1,723 total views, 1 views today
I put the power supply on a board and wired it all up. I figure I'm getting around 60-65% efficiency — far better than the 42% efficiency of using a linear regulator. In other words, if my lighting stuff (the motivation for the 5-volt supply in the first place) outputs 1 watt, the battery will be hit with 1.5 watts whereas if I had used a linear regulator, it'd see 2.4 watts — the 84 watt-hour battery could run for 56 hours instead of 35 hours. Heck, it's almost half as much time as I put into making the fucking thing!
1,696 total views, 2 views today
I got around to the basics of the circuit below. I set up the MOSFET in the configuration below and drove it from the op-amp. I added the PNP in a similar configuration to ensure that maximum current would get to the gate — I need to get that gate to 12 volts, and the 20 mA output on the op-amp wouldn't cut it. I got nice square square-waves but, using a simple pulse-width modulation to the capacitive output, I was getting the same problem of current-in equals current-out. I set up the buck configuration again and finally got some success: 6.6 watts in and 4.2 watts out for an efficiency of 63%.
At this point I realized the output-as-driven would end up as 5-volts from the positive battery rail. I remembered having 7905 negative-rail 5-volt regulators around (and always thinking, "what the hell will I ever use these for?") I switched to the terminology where the positive battery terminal was ground (calling it 0-volts) and the negative rail was -12 volts. I spent some time diagramming the circuit (using CADintosh from Lemke Software, GMBH.) I went back and set things up like I had drawn, made a few changes, and did some final tests on the breadboard. By varying resistors, and using the 51-ohm load I got 97mA out (4.95 volts at 470 mW) with 52 mA at the input (624 mW) for an efficiency of 75%. I tried the 8-ohm load and got 620mA out (4.96 volts at 3.08 watts) with an input current of 419 mA (5.03 watts) which gave me an efficiency of 61%. I think this looks pretty good.
So, after three days of slaving for a total of 20 hours or so, here's the circuit …
You can look up explanations for a twin-T oscillator and a buck converter for the oscillator and the inductor on the Internet, but one thing that I don't think is too obvious is that the diode after the op-amp is there so the base of the PNP transistor can actually go to the rail — the op-amp may not reach it, but the diode will be shut off so the 470-ohm resistor will shut the transistor down. The other thing is that the inductor has no value. I don't know what it is: it's a yellow torroid with red magnet wire that I pulled out of a dead computer UPS, so I don't know its value, but of the ones I had lying around, it worked best. I guess I should put parallel lines below it because it's iron-core … oh well.
1,750 total views, 2 views today
First, the "10-potentiometer method" is when you have the basic idea for a circuit but tune it by varying values until it works the way you want. That's basically where I started.
The general idea is that I wanted to make a high-current source for the 5-volts I'll need to run the logic circuits and LED's (I wired the LED's to expect 5-volts on the input resistor) that's pretty clean, but it doesn't have to be perfect. I knew I didn't want to start with a linear supply: if I went from 12 volts to 5 volts, the power efficiency is 42% (i.e. at 1 amp it's 12 watts in for 5 watts out and 5 watts / 12 watts = 42%.) However, I also didn't want to go with an off-the-shelf solution — mostly because I thought my requirements were really easy.
I got up on Monday, August 1 really early and got started. I dug through my transistor bin to find an NPN that could handle around 3 amps. When I started I figured I could go from 12 volts to half that (6-volts) and then drop the rest through a 7805 regulator to give a nicely cleaned-up output.
I got a buck-style converter set up. It was similar to the circuit above — using the twin-T oscillator as a source for pulse-width modulation on an op-amp — but I didn't use the 7905 and just had a couple 100K resistors on the input pin of the feedback op-amp to approximate 6 volts, I didn't have a high-pass filter on the feedback circuit, the oscillator was running from +12 volts to 0 (or 0 to -12 volts as I've got it diagrammed) and the output was just a current follower where I had an NPN set up with the base tied to the output of the PWM op-amp (top right) with its collector tied to battery-positive, and the emitter driving the diode/inductor/capacitor buck setup.
I ran 127mA through 51 ohms to get 6.7 volts (850 mW) and I was able to source 5 volts at 1 amp into 5 ohms (25 watts) although it seems to go linear. I suspect the transformer I'm was using as an inductor doesn't have enough current capacity. I tried 8 ohms and managed to source 800mA at 6 volts (2.4 watts) and that seemed to be the limit of the power source before going linear (the transistor was on at over a 90% duty cycle.) With that output current, I checked the input and it was drawing around 650mA at 12 volts or 7.8 watts — hardly efficient at all at 33%. With the 51-ohm load, it uses 130mA just like the output … then again, maybe my meter just isn't very good at measuring transient currents like the circuit is drawing from the battery. I used the oscilloscope instead so I could estimate the waveform (and actually calculate RMS voltages) with an 0.1 ohm resistor — a handy value for converting to current (volts times ten.)
I tried some differnet chokes and found one that would cause the circuit to input 700mA RMS (2A peak-to-peak) at 12 volts (8.4 watts) for an output of 1 amp into 8 ohms (8 watts) so that's pretty good (although for some reason it decides to output 8 volts instead of 6 volts.) I tried switching to another op-amp (now the LM324 which is what I stuck with throughout) figuring that it could get its output closer to the rails — that got me to around 65% at 8 ohms but only 24% at 51 ohms, but running that inefficiently, I would expect 2 watts dissipated on the bare transistor to get hot really fast … hmm … I'm concerned about my measuring efficiency. I tried estimating the waveform power levels with some calculations and got to a 45% efficient — worse than the 50% efficiency of just dropping half the voltage as a resistive load.
I kept switching coils, transistors, and resistors. Man am I sick of staring at breadboards and oscilloscopes. I got varying figures and even created perpetual motion machines: I had a 115% efficiency at one point. I was certain it was measurement error.
Up until now, I was using a linear power supply for the 12-volt input. When I switched to the battery, everything stopped working. I had to start all over again — I tried varying the frequency of the PWM oscillator then I tried removing the feedback loop to see if I could get something out unregulated and met with some success. I also floated the PWM oscillator (oh yeah: originally I had the emitter tied to ground, so the oscillator was running very close to the rails.) I added a filter capacitor at the input. All this helped but didn't get me any closer to something that could significantly beat a linear supply.
I decided to check my 0.1 ohm resistor to make sure it's good. Using the meter, I measured a 203 ohm resistor in series with the 0.1 ohm and measured 12.67 volts across it (when I hooked the two series resistors across the battery) for a current of 62.41mA. The 0.1 ohm resistor dropped 0.0123 V so the resistance is actually 0.197 ohms. Once I figured that out, all my efficiencies were twice as good. I took a break and enjoyed the catharsis, but I really didn't believe my measurements so I went back and did them again. Using a 303 ohm resistor, I get 12.74 volts across it which is 42mA and I measured 4.0 mV across the 0.1 ohm resistor, making it 0.095 ohms. Darn. I tried the other resistor: it now reads 205 ohms and dropped 12.70 volts or 61.95 mA. Given the 5.9mV drop on the test resistor, I get 0.095 ohms again.
I tried making a PNP current source to drive the NPN current follower off the op-amp … somewhat similar to what I've got above, but the PNP output goes to an NPN current follower. That gave me an efficiency of 42%. I stripped the circuit back to the point that the transistor is switching a full 12 volts on-and-off at a 50% duty cycle, and still it has a 50% efficiency. The collector-emitter voltage switches between 12-volts and 1.5 volts, but that only accounts for some of the inefficiency. I decided to try a MOSFET in the same configuration but got the same result.
Tuesday I got up early again and I figured the feedback loop was giving me trouble by switching off the resistors too soon regardless of the high-pass filter I added yesterday. I thought about using a sample-hold circuit on each pulse, but then thought that was stupid and would be a waste of time. Instead I figured that the output transistor can't get fully on or fully off based on the op-amp. I couldn't figure out what to do about it. I tried using a buck-boost configuration where the inductor is in parallel to the output but that didn't work. Heck, the inductors had no appreciable effect at all.
Once I did some measurements, I figured out the big problem. The MOSFET output was swinging from 0 volts to 8.1 volts when using the 8-ohm load. That 4 volts at 670 mA (6 ohms) with 50% duty cycle accounts for 1.3 watts of power loss (out of a total input of around 8 watts and an output of 3.5 watts, so there's still some 3.2 watts going somewhere I haven't found yet.) I tried the 51 ohm load and the peak is around 9.1 volts with a current of 120mA but with about a 30% duty cycle — 75 ohms this time accounting for 360 mW out of a total loss of 710 mW. I checked, and if I supply a full 12 volts to the gate of the MOSFET, the maximum output is only 9.1 volts into 51 ohms. Harumph.
I switched to some 2N277 PNP transistors I had lying around in the switch-configuration I have on the first stage of the output in the circuit above. However, that didn't work. I tried the more reliable small-signal PNP's but that didn't work either.
1,484 total views, 2 views today
I went back to using bipolar transistors and managed to make a circuit that could get up to 12 volts. I changed the output circuit to a darlington network to get more gain (hopefully.) The circuit was operating at an input voltage of 2.7 volts.
I tried switching to the 5-volt supply and I could comfortably get 12 volts into 220 ohms — 54 mA for a total power of 0.65 watts; with 51 ohms, I could get 8 volts or 1.3 watts. I'm pretty sure I'm up against the output capacity of the transistor at this point, so I tried a heat sink but it didn't help.
Anyway, in the process of digging around, I found this high-power NPN transistor. I hooked it up on the DC-DC converter and managed to drop 15 volts across a 51-ohm load with 5 volts in — a total of 4.4 watts. That's getting there.
1,573 total views, 2 views today
I found a website that described DC-DC converter basics. I took a crack at building a "boost" style step-up DC-DC converter (where an inductor is placed in series with a power source and the output side is switched to ground.) I managed to step 5 volts to 24 volts across a 1.2K load (using low-power components) for a current of 20mA or almost 0.5 watts.
I found that transformers work particularly well in the circuit — plus, the secondaries offer useful voltages as well. By switching to better transistors (i.e. 2N2222 instead of 2N4123) I achieved 38V out into 1.2K: 32mA or 1.2W. This looks very promising … now if only I could get it to work from 1 volt.
I measured across 51 ohms and got up to 9.3 volts out. The input current is about 0.46A at 5.7V, so that's 2.62 watts and the output into 51 ohms is 0.18A or 1.70 watts out, so it's about 65% efficient. Using a smaller torroidal inductor, I got 8.62V into 51 ohms or 1.47W with 5.82V at 0.40A in or 2.34 watts for 62% efficiency.
I started building one to work off 1.5 volts or so. At first I didn't get it to work. I rebuilt the whole circuit and got exactly the same bizarre result: a short-cycle square wave that seems to ring down. I couldn't get the thing to work. The capacitor on the NPN transistor seems to be running into negative voltage territory somehow … it actually oscillates, but the final output is a stilted square wave. I switched to a (possibly more stable) twin-T design which I managed to get to work with as little as 3 volts.
I thought that I could try using MOSFETs but I couldn't figure out how to get them to work.
1,660 total views, 2 views today
I found a circuit at a website called the Joule Thief. It's a nifty LED driver circuit that can allow an LED to be driven from a nearly dead battery. I figured it would work to boost the voltage from the generators I had but I couldn't get it to work with my limited knowledge (and lack of caring to figure out how the circuit really worked.) I suspect it relies on the nature of LED's to oscillate properly.
I got a couple bigger 12-volt motors from the electric cars for kids to drive around in — all from the trash. The smaller one can source 8A at 0.5V or 4 watts, and the larger can source 9A at 0.6V or 5.4 watts … both at 3,100 RPM.
1,925 total views, 2 views today